Miller v. Noyes
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Doniphan District Court. Action brought, before a justice of the peace,'by Noyes against Miller, to recover on a promissory note. A process in garnishment was issued and served upon School District No. 21, in Doniphan county, whereby the plaintiff .undertook to garnish the wages of the defendant, who was teaching in the public school of that district.
Read the full summary
Error from Doniphan District Court. Action brought, before a justice of the peace,'by Noyes against Miller, to recover on a promissory note. A process in garnishment was issued and served upon School District No. 21, in Doniphan county, whereby the plaintiff .undertook to garnish the wages of the defendant, who was teaching in the public school of that district. The garnished district in its answer acknowledged itself indebted to the defendant in the sum of $80, his salary for one month. Trial February 26, 1883.' The defendant, not contesting the right, of plaintiff to recover upon the…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
A. H. Miller instituted this proceeding in error to reverse a judgment of the district court affirming an order made by a justice of the peace. It appears that C. W. Noyes sued A. H. Miller before a justice of the peace of Doniphan county, to recover upon a promissory note, and at the *14same time caused process in garnishment to be issued aud served upon School District No. 21, Doniphan county, by which the plaintiff undertook to garnish the wages of A. H. Miller, who was teaching in the public school of that district. At the trial before…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mull v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Simpson v. RothschildSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Snyder v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Kansas City v. GoughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Carlyle v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.