Snyder v. Elliott
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by R. P. Elliott, as executor of the estate of Cornelius D. Perryman, deceased, against Peter Snyder. From an order denying defendant’s motion to dissolve an attachment, he brings error. On motion to dismiss.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.
This case presents error from the district court of Tulsa county, Olda., and is an appeal from an order of the district court refusing to dissolve an attachment. Counsel for defendant in error have filed a motion to disfniss the appeal, for the reason that no appeal or proceeding in error will lie from such an order. The motion must be sustained. See Snavely v. Abbott Buggy Co., 36 Kan. 106, 12 Pac. 522, wherein will be found a full discussion of this question; the court in the syllabus saying:
“An order of the district court overruling a motion to discharge an attachment is not reviewable in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- A. T. & S. F. Rld. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Burton v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Brown v. KimbleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
- Snavely v. Abbott Buggy Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Dolbee v. HooverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Garretson v. MeekerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hodges v. Haller Proprietary Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Saunders v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Consolidated Alfalfa Milling Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Henson v. HaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.