Legal Opinion
Ruocco v. Bateman, Eichler, Hill, Richards, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 18, 1990No. 88-6655PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge:
This action involves claims by John Ruoc-co, on behalf of himself and current and former Bateman, Eichler, Hill, Richards, Inc., et al., (“BEHR”) employees who participated in BEHR’s long-term disability plan between January 1, 1982 and December 30, 1984. The plaintiff class claims that BEHR violated its fiduciary duties, the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (1982 & Supp. V 1987), section 8315 of the California Commercial Code, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (1982 &…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stewart v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. Keith Ahue, and Air Line Pilots Association, International, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Unum Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995
- Graham v. Balcor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Miller v. Rite Aid Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.