Cordova v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Chief Judge.
The city instituted individual condemnation proceedings to acquire the appellants’ property to complete the Pueblo Center Redevelopment Project number Arizona R-8. The city moved for summary judgment on the issue of its right to take the subject property and the court granted its motion for partial summary judgment. The “partial summary judgment” recites:
“NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff have, and is hereby granted, Judgment against the Defendants Cordova in each of the above-captioned actions on the issue of Plaintiff’s right to take the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Moses v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Ginn v. Superior Court, in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Big Horn Coal Company v. SHERIDAN-WYO. COAL COMPANYWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
- Valley National Bank v. TammsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Bailey v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Osuna v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.