Osuna v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Penny Osuna appeals from the trial court’s grant of the appellees’, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Sam’s Club (collectively, Wal-Mart), motion to dismiss and asserts the court abused its discretion in denying her leave to amend her second amended complaint. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶2 In September 2001, Brian Thacker, Staci Thacker, Patricia Carrillo, and Tamela Wyble filed a putative class action against Wal-Mart. The complaint alleged Wal-Mart had “forc[ed] Plaintiffs and the Class to work…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- William H. Davis v. Txo Production Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Tiernan v. DevoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Palmieri v. DefariaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harris v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- KOOL RADIATORS, INC. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.