Legal Opinion

People v. Sanders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 2012PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*799“The filing of a sufficient Anders brief is essential to ensuring that an indigent party’s rights are protected. Requiring counsel to submit a brief referring to anything in the record that might support the appeal ensures that assigned counsel acted as an advocate, rather than as a mere advisor to the court on the merits of the appeal” (Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252, 256 [2011]; see Anders v California, 386 US 738, 744 [1967]). Here, the submitted Anders brief was deficient, as assigned counsel did not perform the role of a zealous advocate by identifying possible issues for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In re Giovanni S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. SingletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. OvalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. PoznanskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  5. People v. AbdulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API