Osborn v. Scottish-American Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge. Bespondents mortgaged lot 4 in block 3, Central Seattle, to appellant. The lot was partly upland and partly tide land, the title of the latter portion not being in the mortgagors.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge. Bespondents mortgaged lot 4 in block 3, Central Seattle, to appellant. The lot was partly upland and partly tide land, the title of the latter portion not being in the mortgagors. Subsequently the mortgagors acquired title to a portion of tide lands described as lot 4, block 223, Seattle Tide Lands, which included substantially that portion of the tide land which had been platted as a part of lot 4, block 3, Central Seattle.
1Opinion of the Court
*84The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, J.
We think, under the judgment in this case, exact justice was accorded all the parties litigant; that appellant received what its mortgage called for; and that, so far as the claim of respondent is concerned in the cross appeal, the cases cited do not apply to the facts as shown by the record; and that inasmuch as the mortgage described the property as lot 4 in block 3, according to the recorded plat thereof; and the said recorded plat described lot 4 in block 3 as being a lot fifty by one hundred and twenty feet, the description was plain and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Peoples Savings Bank v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Davis v. StarkenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Everly v. WoldWashington Supreme Court · 1923