Legal Opinion

Seward v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1976No. 6493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OSBORN, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice suit involving the question of whether or not proceeding to judgment for medical expenses only, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, will toll the statute of limitations against a third party treating physician, where the claimant has previously been paid all compensation payments which he was entitled to receive under the law. The trial Court sustained a plea of limitations and entered summary judgment for the third party physician. We affirm.

The Appellant sustained an accidental injury in the course of his employment on November 19,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Lloyds v. HaygoodTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Watson v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Texas Employers Insurance v. BrandonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Yeary v. HinojosaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weaver v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Holifield v. National Cylinder Gas Division of Chemetron Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API