Legal Opinion
Kevin v. Reynolds v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Canon Business Solutions and Broadspire Insurance Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 2014No. 12-AA-665PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Senior Judge:
Petitioner, Kevin V. Reynolds, petitions this court to review the April 18, 2012, Order of the Compensation Review Board (“CRB”) of the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services. The CRB affirmed the Compensation Order issued by the Office of Hearings and Adjudication (“OHA”) on April 14, 2011, that determined that petitioner’s use of narcotic pain medication after July 1, 2009, was not “reasonable and necessary” and therefore the employer was not required to pay for it under D.C.Code § 32-1507 (2012 Repl.). For the reasons stated below, we conclude that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Georgetown University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ferreira v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Marriott International v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Mills v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adonis Holland v. DC DOES / Oncore Constructions Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Holland v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018