Legal Opinion
Holland v. Dist. of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 2018No. 16–AA–0846Published
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge:
Petitioner Adonis Holland seeks review of a Compensation Review Board ("CRB") Decision and Order affirming the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") denial of Petitioner's continued prescription for oxycodone based on the finding that the medication was not "reasonable and necessary." See Reynolds v. District of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs. , 86 A.3d 1157, 1160-61 (D.C. 2014) ; see also D.C. Code § 32-1507 (2012 Repl.). Petitioner argues *39that substantial evidence did not support the CRB's finding because the ALJ failed to adequately consider Petitioner's…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Georgetown University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Clark v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Marriott International v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Darden v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.