Fostoria Gold Mining Co. v. Hazard
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Gilpin District Court. Eon. A. E. DeFrance, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
Action to enforce a vendor’s lien for the unpaid purchase price of lands. From a decree in plaintiffs’ favor, defendant appeals.
The complaint does not state a cause of action. In substance it charges merely that, at defendant’s request, at a certain time plaintiffs delivered to a bank in escrow two deeds; one of which was from one of the plaintiffs, Morris Hazard, to defendant for certain described lands, and the other from the two plaintiffs jointly to defendant for certain other described lands; which two deeds, and two other certain deeds already in the bank covering a part of the property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Francis v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
- Schiffer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Brisco v. Minah Consol. Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1897
- Ortmann v. PlummerMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Waterfield v. WilberMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gerstell v. ShirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Farrell v. WysongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Wiley v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Hazard v. Fostoria Gold Mining Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1915
- Hazard v. Fostoria Gold Mining Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.