Legal Opinion

Schiffer v. Adams

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Bio Grande County.

1Opinion of the Court

Richmond, C.

Adams, the appellee, ’filed his complaint in the court below against Schiffer, Forsch and Stern, praying for an accounting and a reconveyance to him of the Aztec lode and Aztec mill-site, and, in case he should not be entitled to this relief, that the defendants be decreed to pay him certain sums of money which had been retained or allowed to the defendants under certain settlements made between them, which sums of money were so retained and allowed as the result of coercion, intimidation and duress on the part of Schiffer.

In the first trial of this cause the court below dismissed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sternberger v. . McGovernNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Adams v. SchifferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. White v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Bradley v. PalenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Graves v. . TruebloodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pope v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. Farrell v. WysongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  3. Fostoria Gold Mining Co. v. HazardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Zobel v. Fannie Rawlings Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  5. Wellington Realty Co. v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API