Legal Opinion

Brisco v. Minah Consol. Min. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana

Decided May 17, 1897No. 235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowles, J.

The first point presented for consideration in this case is the right to a vendor’s lien. Plaintiffs contracted to sell and convey to defendants certain quartz lode mining- claims named and' described as the “Minah Lot 41, East End,” “Minah Lot 49, West End,” “Homestake,” “The Annie B,” “The Hillsdale,” “Iron Dollar,” "(told Cross,” and “Iowa,” situate in Colorado mining district, Jefferson county, Mont. The contract of sale recites: “Whereas, the first parties are the owners and in possession of certain mining ground consisting of quartz lode mining claims situate near Wickes, in the county…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cordova v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Galloway v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Slide & Spur Gold Mines v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Chilton v. Braiden's AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  5. Bush v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1848

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fostoria Gold Mining Co. v. HazardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. Quaker Oats Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Rosenbaum v. HayesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API