Legal Opinion

Ortmann v. Plummer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Bay. (Green, J.) Bill to enforce lien. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The bill in this ease was filed to enforce rights growing out of a lien claimed for unpaid purchase money of a tract of timbered land. In 1874 a firm which had become interested, under the name of Yan Etten, Campbell & Co., in the assets of a previous firm, were holders of a contract for 2209 acres, partly paid for, which had belonged, to complainant and others, and then were practically .complainant’s. At the same time complainant and one Boeing held a contract for 4892.86 acres, originally made by the Jackson, Lansing '& Saginaw Railroad Company to Dexter A. Ballou, on which some payments…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Biddle v. BiddleMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Lavin v. LynchMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Fostoria Gold Mining Co. v. HazardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API