Legal Opinion

Robinson v. DeFazio

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 2017No. 12CV1144; A156582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Defendant Peter DeFazio appeals from a supplemental judgment that awarded him some, but not all, of his attorney fees and costs against plaintiff Art Robinson. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by applying unlawful and impermissible factors when it reduced defendant’s attorney fee request.1 As explained below, we conclude that the trial court abused its discretion when it reduced defendant’s award of attorney fees.2 Accordingly, we vacate and remand on appeal.

The circumstances material to our analysis and disposition are undisputed. Plaintiff and incumbent defendant were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Handy v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Alt v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jonathan Tallman v. Dillon SpencerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
  2. Owens v. State Farm Fire And Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
  3. Robinson v. DeFazioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API