Legal Opinion

Robinson v. DeFazio

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 2017No. 12CV1144; A156582Published

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Plaintiff has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in Robinson v. DeFazio, 284 Or App 98, 392 P3d 781 (2017), contending that our construction of the phrase “trial of an issue of law or fact” in ORS 20.190 (2)1 is incorrect. We allow plaintiffs petition and, on reconsideration, adhere to our decision as modified by this opinion.

In our original opinion, we concluded that, in the context of ORS 20.190(2), “trial of an issue of law or fact” “refers to the judicial determination of law or fact in an adversarial proceeding, which can include preliminary proceedings short of a final trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Association of Unit Owners of Timbercrest Condominiums v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hume v. WoodruffOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Robinson v. DeFazioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API