Legal Opinion

Dieterle v. Ann Arbor Paint & Enamel Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1906No. Docket No. 40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Bill ,by Ernest A. Dieterle against the Ann Arbor Paint & Enamel Company, William G. Henne, William F.. Breakey, Louis W. Schnierle, and others, to enforce a, liability for unpaid subscriptions to the capital stock of defendant corporation, and for the appointment of a receiver. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is a bill filed by a judgment creditor of the Ann Arbor Paint & Enamel Company, to have the *418original subscribers for stock and subsequent stockholders of said company held liable pro rata for the payment of the indebtedness to complainant, and of all other creditors of said corporation, and for the appointment of a receiver to bring about that result. No other creditor has joined in the proceeding. The bill of complaint was dismissed in the court below. The case is brought here by appeal. The defendant company was organized in March, 1902, with the following statement in its articles of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. Erie Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Bissell v. HeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. McBryan v. Universal Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Duffield v. E. T. Barnum Wire & Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Moore v. Universal Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warren v. Federal Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Wood v. SlomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Olson Manfg. Co. v. Rex Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Crawford v. PierceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API