Legal Opinion
Paul Louis Harrelson v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1980No. 79-1234PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Harrelson appeals from the dismissal of his complaint for failure to prosecute and an injunction preventing him from instituting any further action based on the facts which were alleged in the complaint, including any causes of action which could have been asserted as well as those which were asserted. We affirm.
On December 14, 1978, an Order to Show Cause why Civil Action # 7-77-3 should not be dismissed for want of prosecution was entered, and a hearing on the order was set for January 5, 1979. On January 3, 1979, Harrelson filed a motion for continuance citing as reasons…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- James Hepperle v. James A. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- L. G. Ruderer v. United States of America, Through Howard F. Schlitz, Major GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- James Graves v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Hill v. EstelleDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
- United States v. Paul Louis HarrelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Lonzy Oliver. Appeal of Lonzy OliverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- William S. Sires, Jr. v. Harold GabrielCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- 39 Fair empl.prac.cas. 162, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,583 Eligio Castro and Rafael Diaz Diaz v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.