Legal Opinion

People v. Renfro

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1967No. Crim. 336PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGargano, J.

After trial without a jury appellant, Nolan Ray Renfro, was found guilty of the crime of grand theft in violation of section 484 of the Penal Code. He appeals from the judgment of conviction which was entered thereon.

Defendant does not deny the theft for which he stands convicted. In fact, he freely and voluntarily admitted that he was involved in the theft of some telephone wire in El Dorado County in the area of Shingle Springs. Moreover, the evidence produced against him convincingly establishes that on March 1, 1966, appellant stole two types of telephone cable from the storage yard of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. RobillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor LunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. State v. MatzkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State v. SavageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. State v. EnszNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Cleveland v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API