Davison v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice MULLARKEY’delivered
the Opinion of the Court.
I. Introduction
Consolidating two cases for opinion, we interpret a section of the Workers’ Compensation Act that awards benefits to a worker who is permanently disabled by a job-related psychological trauma. We granted certiorari on two cases in which claimants were denied workers’ compensation benefits because they did not present expert medical or psychological testimony regarding both clauses of “mental impairment” as defined by section 8-*102641-301(2)(a), 3 C.R.S. (2003).1 The two clauses of the “mental impairment” definition require the injury: 1) to be “a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Colorado Department of Labor & Employment v. EsserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. BanksSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Carlson v. FerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- County Workers Compensation Pool v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Lobato v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Anderson v. Longmont Toyota, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Wolford v. Pinnacol AssuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.