Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 18, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

The action is tort for the conversion of a pair of horses and a set of work harnesses. The trial was by court, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff. The ease is here on defendant’s exceptions to certain of ijhe findings and to the judgment.

In March, 1926, the defendant purchased of the plaintiff these horses and harnesses and gave in part payment his conditional sales note for $500. When suit was brought in May, 1931, the defendant was in default in his payments and was then owing on the note, principal and interest, $309.30. No demand was made for the surrender of the property before…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hassam v. J. E. Safford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  2. Grant v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1842
  3. Vermont Acceptance Corp. v. WiltshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  4. Crampton v. Valido Marble Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  5. Manley Bros. v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Redd Distributing Co. v. BrucknerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  2. Gaylord v. HoarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  3. Vermont Evaporator Co. v. TaftSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  4. Simonds v. BishopSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API