Legal Opinion

Manley Bros. v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 6, 1916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Trover for the loss of a part of a shipment of goods. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1914, Windham County, Waterman, J., presiding. Verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. Neither exhibit referred to in the opinion ivas attached to either deposition.

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This is an action of-trover to recover the value of certain property shipped from Detroit to the plaintiffs at Brattleboro.

The .evidence tended to show that the plaintiffs ordered of the Ford Motor Co. of Detroit a bill of goods which included six automobile radiators. That when the shipment arrived at Brattleboro over the defendant railroad’s line, and was cheeked up with the packing slip which came with it, it was short the six radiators covered by the order, — all the other goods shown by the packing slip and included in the order being received. The original bill of lading, dated June 21,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Magnin v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bolling v. Kirby & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Lincoln v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Platt v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. French v. WheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Gallaudet (In Re Gallaudet)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1985
  4. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Vermont Acceptance Corp. v. WiltshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API