Simonds v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
This is an action of tort for the conversion of hay. The plaintiffs had a verdict and judgment below and the ease is here on defendant’s exceptions to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for him, to its charge, its failure to charge as requested and its denial of his motion to set aside the verdict.
The undisputed evidence shows that on January 8, 1935, the defendant entered into a contract, in writing, with one Barrows and his wife to sell them a farm therein described, located in Benson, Vt., together with the personal property thereon, and to execute and deliver to them a good and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Merrihew's Admr. v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Dansro v. ScribnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
- Bagley v. CooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Gentes v. St. PeterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Redd Distributing Co. v. BrucknerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Lalime v. DesbiensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947