Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Shalala

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 12, 1996No. Civil Action 93-1504, 94-1645, and 95-1334 (PLF)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

After a trial before a jury over a seven-day period beginning on November 29, 1995, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff John Blair Hayes, finding by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) he was denied a promotion to a position for which he was qualified by virtue of the defendant’s intentional discrimination against him because of his race; (2) that he was denied a promotion to a position for which he was qualified because of the defendant’s intentional retaliation against him because of his prior EEO activity; and (3) that thereafter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. McKenzie v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel, Hotel & Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. Milvets System Technology, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  2. Aquilino v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  3. Chadwick v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  4. Allen v. BarramDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  5. Fogg v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API