Legal Opinion
Fogg v. Gonzales
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 25, 2005No. Civ.A. 94-2814 JARPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RESTANI, District Judge. **
Plaintiff Matthew Fogg’s motion for equitable relief is before the court upon remand from the court of appeals. See Fogg v. Ashcroft, 254 F.3d 103 (D.C.Cir.2001). A jury found that Fogg’s employer, the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”), violated 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 by subjecting him to a racially hostile work environment, and by discriminating against him on the basis of race in specific instances. Jury Interrog. (Apr. 28, 1998) at ¶ ¶ 1-3. The district court (the “trial court”) entered a judgment for money damages but granted only…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fogg v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- McKenna v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Craig v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Fogg v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Fogg v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007