Legal Opinion
Allen v. Barram
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 23, 2002No. Civil Action 99-2271(JMF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
A jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, 1 who complained that their not being selected for the position of Physical Security Specialist was the result of racial discrimination. This case is therefore now in the remedy phase with the court obliged to determine what back pay they are entitled to and whether they should now receive the Physical Security Specialist positions that were given to others. 2
The government, however, seeking to deny plaintiffs any remedy whatsoever, renews an argument it made at trial. It had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Walter J. Lander v. Manuel Lujan, Secretary, U.S. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lopera v. Town of CoventryDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009
- Allen v. PerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Pleasants v. RidgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Bullen v. ChaffinchDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2004
- Craig v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018