Legal Opinion
Chadwick v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 13, 1999No. Civil Action 97-2477(PLF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The Court has before it defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, or in the alternative, for a new trial or remitti-tur, and plaintiffs motion to award back pay and prejudgment interest.
After a three-day trial beginning on February 8, 1999, a twelve person jury unanimously found that plaintiff experienced quid pro quo sexual harassment and hostile work environment sexual harassment by virtue of the conduct of her supervisor at the Oak Hill Youth Center. The jury rejected defendant’s affirmative defenses and awarded plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Charles Carter v. District of Columbia, Maurice Turner, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department Charles Carter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Shirley P. Langevine v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Martini v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martinez v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Carmen Jean-Baptiste v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Barnett v. PA Consulting Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Caudle v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Liberatore v. CVS New York, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.