Legal Opinion

Jefferson County Bank v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1933No. 29,228PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

The action is upon promissory notes executed by defendants, payable to the order of Petters and Company, a corporation, and by it, for value, indorsed to plaintiff before maturity. Respondent’s defense was that plaintiff extended the notes without respondent’s knowledge or consent. There was no service on defendant Herbert Erickson, and defendant Zeta Rose Erickson did not answer in time to allow a trial as to her at the time the issues as to respondent were tried. The court made findings in favor of respondent. Appellant’s motion for amended…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. McGintyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Vanderford v. Farmers' & Mechanics' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  3. Zastrow v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Niles v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Wolstenholme v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1908

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. BassIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Northwestern Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Flowers v. GermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Hannah v. United Refrigerated Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API