Legal Opinion
McElwee v. Wharton
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided September 3, 1998No. 1:98CV126PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ENSLEN, Chief Judge.
In accordance with the Court’s Opinion of this date;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hazel Wharton’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 14) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count I (Dkt. No. 12) is GRANTED and that Count J of the Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Choice of Law Ruling (Dkt. No. 27) is GRANTED to the extent that the Court rules that Michigan law applies as to the trade sales representation contract at issue and further rules that the non-competition clause…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Umland v. PLANCO Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Sunseri v. ProctorDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- In re Cay ClubsNevada Supreme Court · 2014
- Umland v. Planco Fin Ser IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008