Legal Opinion

Sunseri v. Proctor

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 30, 2006No. 05-73108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ZATKOFF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is before the Court upon cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 36) on August 4, 2006, and Defendants responded on September 7, 2006. On August 7, 2006, Defendants filed their own Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #39), to which Plaintiffs responded on September 7, 2006. Each party has since filed a reply to the other’s response, along with hundreds of pages of exhibits. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sunseri v. MoenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. Osuji v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  3. Delizo v. Ability Works Rehab Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  4. Oakland Physicians Medical Center, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. Savu v. Purolite CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API