Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Cannon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1895No. 295PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for First District, in an appeal from Austin County. The opinion gives a sufficient statement.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

—In this case, the Court of Civil Appeals refused to consider several of the appellant’s assignments of error, because the statement of facts found in the record did not appear to have been approved by the judge who tried the cause; and affirmed the j udgment. A motion for a rehearing was filed, in which it was alleged, that in point of fact the statement had been approved by the trial judge, and that his approval appeared upon the original statement of facts on file among the papers of the cause in the office of the district clerk. The motion was supported by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. O'KeefeTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Moore v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Wichita Valley Railway Com. v. PeeryTexas Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Spence v. FenchlerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Blalock v. SlocombTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Danner v. Walker-Smith Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Royal Insurance v. Texas & Gulf Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API