Legal Opinion

Moore v. Rice

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1879PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Houston. Tried below before the Hon. E. S. Walker. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

The judgment in this case is complained of by both parties, the intervenor as well as the appellant having assigned errors. We have found, however, at the threshold of the case, the question, whether, after the death of Jane Eice, the sole plaintiff, the necessary parties were brought into court to enable it to proceed to judgment. After her death was suggested separate pleas of intervention were filed, by leave of court, by G. F. Moore and D. A. Hunn, claiming, by assignments from and under Jane Eice, all interest and all rights asserted .by her in her suit, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. WileyTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Webster v. HitchcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Clark v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Russell's heirs v. Craig'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Amarillo Improvement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Mabee v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CannonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Waldrep v. RoquemoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API