Legal Opinion

Foster v. Hinson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 9, 1888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — Hon. Chables H. Phelps, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, C. J.

— In May, 1886, Keziah Poster, one of the plaintiffs, commenced this action, and claimed.in her petition that she was the owner of the undivided one-third part of certain real estate, and that defendants had occupied the same with her knowledge and consent; and the relief asked was that she recover of the defendants the rental value thereof. The defendants answered this petition in June, 1886, and, among other things, pleaded that Sarah Bailey was a necessary party to the action. In October, 1886, an amendment to the petition was filed, in which it was stated that the defendants wrongfully…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hackworth v. ZollarsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Hunt & Co. v. HigmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Dewey v. PeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Jack v. D. M. & Ft. D. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Joyner v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Crow v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Ellis v. BruceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. United States v. California and Oregon Land Company; California and Oregon Land Company v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API