Legal Opinion

Pipa v. Kemberling

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1937No. Appeal, 17PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Argued September 30, 1936, reargued March 11, 1937. John L. Pipa, Jr., a member of the bar of this state and appellant herein, has appealed from an order of the court below quashing a writ of alternative mandamus by which he sought to compel the commissioners of that county to pay him for services rendered and expenses incurred as a special attorney appointed by the Attorney General under Section 907 of the Administrative Code of April 9, 1929, Article IX, P.L. 177, 239, 71 P. S. § 297.

We have concluded that the order quashing the writ should be affirmed but not for the reason assigned by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. LehmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Commonwealth of Pa. Ex Rel. v. IrvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kingston Boro. v. KalanoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Pittsburgh Public Parking Authority PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. United States Steel Co. v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Commonwealth v. RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API