Legal Opinion

Watson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1992No. 16850, 17032PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYLE, Justice.

In this products liability action we are called upon to review several issues including whether a new trial is required upon a showing that the jury rendered a verdict that was based on averaging. Because we hold that the district court did not consider all of the necessary factors and standards when determining whether the jury reached an impermissible quotient verdict, we vacate the order granting a new trial and remand for further consideration. In addition, we affirm the district court’s order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial on other grounds and affirm the…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Highland Enterprises, Inc. v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Blimka v. My Web Wholesaler, LLC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sheridan v. St. Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lanham v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Jordan v. BeeksIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API