Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Department of Employment Security

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 22, 1992No. 910403-CAPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Associate Presiding Judge:

The Department of Employment Security denied petitioner Angela Armstrong (Armstrong) unemployment benefits, and she appealed. An administrative law judge ruled her appeal was untimely, leaving the department’s decision in effect. Armstrong then filed a timely appeal with the Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah (Board) which affirmed the ruling of the administrative law judge. Armstrong now seeks review of the Board’s final decision. We affirm.

FACTS

Kinko’s of Salt Lake, a copy and printing company, employed Armstrong for approximately…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Grace Drilling Co. v. Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Idaho State Insurance Fund v. HunnicuttIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pro-Benefit Staffing, Inc. v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Rasmussen v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Autoliv ASP, Inc. v. Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  2. Ekshteyn v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  3. Giles v. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICESCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. Morris v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. Newspaper Agency Corp. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API