Legal Opinion

Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Hunnicutt

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1986No. 15469PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

I. BACKGROUND FACTS AND LAW

Calvin J. Hunnicutt was a twenty-six year, permanent employee of the state serving as a compensation insurance payroll auditor with the Idaho State Insurance Fund (ISIF). Hunnicutt was a “classified” employee of the state. This means he held a position with the ISIF “which ... is subject to the provisions of the merit examination, selection, retention, promotion, and dismissal requirements of chapter 53, title 67, Idaho Code.” I.C. § 67-5302(4). As a classified employee, he could only be dismissed in a manner consistent with the laws and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Local 1494 of the International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Wayne County v. Tennessee Solid Waste Disposal Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  2. Grace Drilling Co. v. Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. First National Bank of Boston v. County Board of EqualizationUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lopez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Pace v. HymasIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API