Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Department of Employment Security

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1983No. 48434-1, 48470-8PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, J. *

In these consolidated cases, petitioner and appellant seek review of an agency decision terminating their appeals from denial of unemployment benefits. The Department of Employment Security, the Superior Court and the Court of Appeals each found that good cause did not exist to excuse the untimely filing of their notices of appeal. For the reasons set out below, we affirm.

Although the facts from which the controversies arise in these cases are slightly different, both cases concern the 10-day appeal period for denial of unemployment benefits.

Rasmussen v. Department of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Department of Revenue v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Devine v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Kenna v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance v. MeyeringWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hu Hyun Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Armstrong v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hussa v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API