Legal Opinion

Taormina v. Taormina Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 7, 1951PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

78 A.2d 473 (1951)

TAORMINA et al.

v.

TAORMINA CORP. et al.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

February 7, 1951.

William S. Potter and James L. Latchum, of Southerland, Berl & Potter, Wilmington, for plaintiffs.

Josiah Marvel, Jr., of Logan, Marvel & Boggs, Wilmington, for defendants.

WOLCOTT, Chancellor.

On a motion to dismiss, the facts alleged in the complaint are taken to be true. They are hereafter briefly stated:

Taormina Corporation, a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter called the "Corporation") was organized in 1935 and carried on the business of canning foods. It conducted a profitable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  2. Sohland v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1927
  3. New York Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  4. Brodsky v. FrankIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Fleer v. Frank H. Fleer Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Edward F. BAGDON, Plaintiff-Appellee—Cross-Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., Defendant-Appellant—Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Schoon v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Agostino v. HicksCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API