Legal Opinion

Fleer v. Frank H. Fleer Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 30, 1924PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

While the demurrer presents eleven grounds, the solicitor for the defendant states them generally, as follows:

1. That the bill is multifarious.

2. That insofar as there may be any right on behalf of the corporation to cancel the contracts referred to in the bill, there is no allegation that a request or demand has been made on the corporation to proceed in its own name, nor is there any allegation that the corporation has refused to cause said contracts to be can-celled, and the bill contains no allegation of reasons why demand was not made upon the corporation or that such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Penn Beef Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
  2. Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1918
  3. In re the Election of Directors of Utica Fire Alarm Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Hopper v. Fesler Sales Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1916
  5. Cahall v. LoflandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Sohland v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1927
  3. Kaplan v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Elster v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  5. Harris v. CarterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API