Legal Opinion

Brodsky v. Frank

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1930No. 19786. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff in error, Harry Brodsky, in the superior court of Cook county, began an action of trespass on the case against Sam Frank, Joe Singer, Joseph Smith, Morris Siegel and the Textile Headwear Company, a corporation. The case was tried by a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of Frank and against the other defendants in error for $30,000. Aremittitur of $10,000 was entered and judgment was rendered for the balance. The Appellate Court for the First District reversed the judgment upon the ground that the declaration was predicated upon the theory that plaintiff, in error was induced to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Button v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Life Ass'n of America v. FassettIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Feder v. Midland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Wabash Railroad v. BillingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Luttrell v. WyattIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. Sullivan Chevrolet Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Poliquin v. SappAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Tonchen v. All-Steel Equipment, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Vance Pearson, Inc. v. AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Metropolitan Sanitary District v. Anthony Pontarelli & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API