Legal Opinion

Engelking v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 12, 1987No. 01-85-0742-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

A jury found the appellant guilty of possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, weighing at least 400 grams including adulterants and dilutants. The trial court assessed punishment at 45 years confinement. The appellant asserts 10 points of error.

On October 15, 1984, based on information that drugs were located at a certain address, officers of the Houston Police Department began surveillance of a residence and a detached outbuilding. After the officers detected a chemical odor attributed to methamphetamine production, they obtained a warrant for the search…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Ely v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Engelking v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. McGlothlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. State v. Engelking, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  4. Bigley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Bigley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API