State v. Engelking
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUGHES, Justice.
Pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.P.Ann. art. 44.01(a)(1) (Vernon Supp.1989), the State appeals the trial court’s dismissal of the indictments charging appellees Donald Wayne Engelking and Aaron Lambert Sloan with possession of less than 28 grams of methamphetamine. Tex.Rev.Civ. StatAnn. art. 4476-15, secs. 4.04(b), 4.02(b)(6) (Vernon Supp.1989).
A grand jury originally indicted appellees for possession of methamphetamine weighing at least 400 grains. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 4476-15, sec. 4.04(c), (d)(2) (Vernon Supp.1989). Appellees were tried together, and the jury found…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Engelking v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ex Parte ScellesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EngelkingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- State v. Engelking, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- State v. EngelkingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.