Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bigley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1993No. 939-92Published

1DissentClinton, Judge

The authority claimed for the disposition of the court of appeals is Tex.R.App.Pro., Rule 80(b). Bigley v. State, 831 S.W.2d 409, at 415, n. 2 (Tex.App.—Austin 1992). Today the majority reads the rule literally, as if it were newly granted authority sans any judicial interpretive gloss on its intendment and application.

Rule 80(b) and (c) derive directly from former article 44.24(b), V.A.C.C.P., extant when the Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules (“Guittard Committee”) transformed the article essentially in style and format— with one major exception.1 Thus by descent *30from rules of appellate…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API