Legal Opinion

Bigley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1993No. 939-92Published

1Opinion of the Court

865 S.W.2d 26 (1993)

Ervin Allen BIGLEY, Jr., Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 939-92.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

June 16, 1993.

Rehearing Denied November 17, 1993.

Stephen M. Orr, Austin, for appellant.

Charles D. Penick, Dist. Atty., and John M. Hawkins, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bastrop, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., and Matthew W. Paul, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of possession of 400 grams or more of methamphetamine and assessed…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Bigley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API