Legal Opinion
Holroyd v. Eibling
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
Decided June 14, 1961No. 208541PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSater, J.
The Columbus Board of Education is the lawful controlling body of the School District of the City of Columbus, Ohio. Two of its employees, who carry into effect its official acts, are Harold Eibling, Superintendent of the Columbus Public Schools, and Edgard W. House, Principal of Columbus North High School. This Board acts for the purposes of this case, under the first clause of Section 3 of Article VI of the Constitution of Ohio:
“Provision shall be made by law for the organization, administration and control of the public school system of the state supported by public funds,” * # #
and under…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Waugh v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wilson v. Abilene Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Wilson v. Board of Education of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Board of Trustees of University v. WaughMississippi Supreme Court · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Passel v. Fort Worth Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Robinson v. Sacramento City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Stark County Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Stark County Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1990