Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Sacramento City Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 1966No. Civ. 11249PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
In a complaint entitled as one “for declaratory relief and restraining order,” substituted plaintiff, Judy Robinson, a member of a club called the “Manana Club” in Sacramento (through her father as guardian ad litem) seeks to have a rule of the governing board of the Sacramento City Unified School District, known as "Rule 4, ’ ’ declared invalid as unconstitutional. In the trial court judgment was for plaintiff, declaring the rule “void as applied to the plaintiff.” The school district and its agents (presumably including the board) were enjoined from enforcing it. We have concluded that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Allied Properties v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Waugh v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wilson v. Abilene Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Myers v. Arcata Union High Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Akin v. Board of Education of Riverside Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Carlson v. Paradise Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Naismith Dental Corp. v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.