Legal Opinion

Perham v. Putnam

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1928No. 6,281PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myers

This is a replevin action, instituted to recover possession of an automobile, seized and sold for taxes, or the value thereof, if possession might not be had.

Plaintiff was engaged in the business of selling automobiles. On a conditional sale contract, he sold an automobile to one George George, a resident of Butte, Silver Bow County. George took possession of the car and took it to the oil fields in Toole County and there used it throughout the summer and fall of 1924. In January, 1925, George had the car put in storage in the Eckel Motor Garage, conducted by the Eckel Motor Company, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weyse v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Larson v. PeppardMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Burton v. KippMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Crowell v. BarhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  5. Birney v. WarrenMontana Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tillman v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Albright v. State, by and Through StateMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Independent School Dist. No. 39 of Creek County v. Exchange National Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Swartz v. BergMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Butte Country Club v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API