Legal Opinion

Warren v. Pim

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 21, 1904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in Í80 Dick. Ch. Rap. 86.

1Opinion of the CourtDixon, J.

The bill of complaint in this cause was filed in January, 1903, by Lyman E. Warren against the Fisheries Company, a corporation of this state, I. Harold Pim, Langley Archer West and Montgomery Iiorne-Payne, constituting what is called the “Pim committee,” and the Association of Foreign Shareholders of the Fisheries Company of New Jersey, Limited, a corporation of Great Britain. Subsequently Nathaniel 3. Church, Adolph Hirsh, James E. Heller, the American Net and Twine Company, William B. M. Chase and John Shepard were admitted as complainants in the suit.

The objects of the bill are — first,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Franklin Co. v. Lewiston Institution for SavingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
  2. Parsons v. Tacoma Smelting & Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Bankers' Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. SlossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Mann v. HOUSING AUTHORITY, PATERSONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Musto v. VidasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API