Legal Opinion

Speer v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1938No. Civ. 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

Appellant Andra Speer commenced this action against one N. N. Brown, a duly licensed physician and surgeon, claiming that he had undertaken for a consideration to treat her for overweight, and in so doing negligently prescribed for her a drug known as denitrophenol in such large doses as to result in her becoming partially blind. After appearing in the action, defendant Brown died, whereupon the attorneys who had represented him moved the court to dismiss the action by reason of his death and a judgment of dismissal was entered accordingly, from which the present appeal is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Boor v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Basler v. Sacramento Elec., Gas & Ry.California Supreme Court · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Rubino v. Utah Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Hinton v. Republic Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API